How we estimate water visibility
No agency publishes a live feed of underwater visibility, so this one is derived. The inputs, the weighting, the score bands, and what the method gets wrong.
Every other number on this site is measured by somebody. Tides come from NOAA's prediction stations, water temperature from sea-surface readings, waves and swell from a global marine model, weather from the National Weather Service. Water clarity is the exception. No agency publishes a live feed of how far you can see underwater at a given beach, so the number here is derived. This page is how.
Why nobody measures it
Visibility is stubbornly local. It can be twenty feet at one end of a beach and five at the other, on the same morning, because a channel drains there or a bar keeps the sand moving. It also changes within hours. A wind shift can wreck a good morning before lunch.
Turbidity sensors do exist, mostly on research moorings and estuary monitoring networks. They are sparse, they sit where scientists needed them instead of where people swim, and what they record is suspended sediment concentration. That tracks how far you can see only loosely, since particle size and light both change the answer. Converting one to the other reliably would need calibration at each site. The honest summary is that the measurement you want is made by people in the water, and those observations are not collected anywhere you can query.
What the estimate reads
Wind carries most of the weight, and its direction matters more than its speed. Wind blowing off the land grooms the surface and lets the water settle. Wind blowing in off the sea stacks up chop and lifts sediment off the bottom. The same fifteen miles an hour can mean a clear day or a blown-out one depending on which way it points.
Rain is the next strongest signal, because runoff carries sediment and whatever the streets were holding. Recent rain and a high chance of rain in the next few hours are both treated as bad. Algal blooms and red tide are treated as a severe penalty, since they affect both what you can see and whether you want to be in the water at all. Tide direction is a small nudge, with an incoming tide slightly favoured because it tends to bring cleaner offshore water in. Short-period swell gets a small penalty, since steep, closely spaced waves stir the bottom more than long ground swell of the same height.
Working out which way the coast faces
Calling wind onshore or offshore requires knowing which way the shoreline points, and that is not something you can hardcode for a site covering 86 spots on every US coast. An east-facing Atlantic beach and a west-facing Pacific one respond to a west wind in opposite ways.
The trick used here is that swell already answers the question. Swell arrives from open water, so the direction it comes from is a usable proxy for the direction the coast faces. That makes the onshore reading correct on any coastline without a hand-maintained table of shore bearings. When no marine data is available, the wind is treated as cross-shore and neither helps nor hurts, because guessing an orientation would invert the reading on half the country.
How the score becomes a word
The score starts at 7 out of ten, which sits in the middle band, so a location we know nothing about reads as unremarkable. Each factor moves it up or down, and the result is clamped to the zero to ten range before it is turned into a label.
| Score | Shown as | Roughly means |
|---|---|---|
| 8 to 10 | Clear | Worth the drive. Conditions are working for you. |
| 6 to 8 | Decent | Fine. Nothing is actively against you. |
| 3.5 to 6 | Murky | You will get in and wish you had not. |
| 0 to 3.5 | Poor | Something specific is wrong. Usually wind or runoff. |
What it does not do
This is a heuristic, and the site labels it an estimate everywhere it appears. The weights were tuned against South Florida diving, where the author is in the water often enough to check them, so it is most trustworthy on that coast and least trustworthy somewhere with unusual local behaviour. A river mouth will fool it. So will anywhere whose clarity is governed by an upwelling cycle.
It has no sensor, so it cannot see a plume that has not rained into existence yet, and it does not know where the outfalls are. It de-weights swell deliberately, which means a big clean ground swell will not drag the number down as much as some divers would expect. And when inputs are missing the site says so: the estimate carries a confidence level that drops when fewer sources answered.
How to check it
Every conditions page lists the specific reasons behind its visibility reading rather than only the word. If a spot says murky, it names the cause, whether that is onshore chop or recent rain, so you can disagree with the reasoning instead of guessing at it. Compare it against the spots you know on a day you have been in the water, and the places where it is wrong will tell you more than the places where it is right.